20200108_Commission meeting_JF.jpg

Albany County resident Ramsey Bentley stands at the front of a crowd gathered outside of the Albanly County Commission chambers Tuesday morning for the commissioners regular meeting. Every seat in the house was filled with overflow spilling into the hallway as people looked to participate in or observe the meeting.

After debate lasting nearly four hours on Tuesday, Albany County commissioners voted 2-1 to re-zone a six-acre piece of property on the east side of Laramie from small-lot residential to commercial.

The land, which lies directly west of the Tumbleweed Express gas station, had been proposed for rezone by Laramie man Luke Sweckard, owner of Sweckard Excavation, who said he hopes to sell the land to someone who might construct office buildings or a restaurant.

However, concerns about its proximity to a vulnerable area of the Casper Aquifer led to an outpouring of opposition from Albany County residents.

About 100 people came to the county board meeting Tuesday morning, with most attending out of concern for the zoning change. Commissioner Pete Gosar, the lone “no” vote on the zoning changes, said he had also recently received more than 80 other written comments in opposition to the zoning change. A couple dozen residents spoke during public comment, the vast majority in opposition to the proposal.

Ultimately, commissioners Heber Richardson and Terri Jones voted in favor of the zoning change, with Richardson saying he thought “commercial development right there will be less impactful.”

“I don’t believe 20, 30, 50 years from now, there will be any contamination to the quality of the aquifer based on this development,” he said.

Many residents expressed concerns that more commercial development atop the aquifer recharge area could potentially contaminate the water source that provides about half of Laramie’s drinking water and the entirety of water for hundreds of well-owners east of town.

On the eastern edge of Laramie lies the Aquifer Protection Overlay Zone, which bans certain types of commercial development, including gas stations and dry cleaners.

The western boundary of the APOZ bisects the Sweckard property, though only a small percentage lies within the APOZ as currently drawn on maps.

However, some in Laramie, like geologist Bern Hinckley, have suggested that western boundary might be in the wrong spot.

Under the Albany County’s aquifer protection plan, the APOZ encompasses 79-square mile area where there is at least 75 feet of Satanka shale atop the aquifer.

Based on the thickness of the shale below the Tumbleweed Express site directly across the street on Bluebird Lane, some in Laramie contend that most of the Sweckard property likely has less than the 75 feet of shale, which, if verified, would ban certain commercial development. Residents in the area asked to county to convene a study last year, but commissioners declined on a 2-1 vote.

Gosar expressed opposition to the zoning change, in part, because of the potential that a business not allowed in the APOZ could be established on the Sweckard property, ultimately leading to a second non-conforming use that’s been grandfathered in — assuming the APOZ western boundary were ever to be redrawn to include the Sweckard property. Currently, Tumbleweed Express, the only known commercial business that lies within the APOZ, is non-conforming to the regulation, but has been grandfathered in and can continue to operate in perpetuity.

Under the county’s zoning rules, county commissioners must have determined that the new zoning status “will not result in significant adverse impacts to natural and environmental resources such as water quality.”

Gosar argued that, knowing there’s some evidence the Sweckard property might have less than 75 feet of shale, the commissioners could not, in good faith, make that “finding of fact.”

The city of Laramie had also requested that commissioners limit the types of commercial development allowed on the property.

“Based on current technical data, it can be expected that less than 75 feet of Satanka Formation can be found under most of this property; thus, under the county’s Casper aquifer protection plan this property should be included within the aquifer protection overlay zone,” Assistant City Manager Todd Feezer wrote in a letter to the county. “The city would also offer annexation as an alternative to county zoning changes. Annexation would require connection to city water and sewer services which have been shown to be safer for the aquifer.”

Albany County Attorney Peggy Trent cautioned the commissioners that there is potential for a legal case based on the vote’s outcome.

“That zoning decision can be appealed to the district court, and you have extensive public comments right now opposed to it,” she said. “Potentially, this is going to become litigation. … This will not be covered by our liability pool. This will be my office representing you if this gets brought up on appeal.”

Several commenters expressed concern that Sweckard might sell the property to someone who does build a gas station, a rumor that Sweckard and his attorney, Mitch Edwards, vehemently denied Tuesday.

“There is no offer to purchase the property and there’s no contract to sell the property,” Edwards said.

Edwards said there’s no inherent risk of commercial development, noting that other major commercial development happens all the time, without protest, on the APOZ.

Even if there were legitimate concerns about certain types of development, Edwards said the most appropriate time to block progress is when zoning certificates are being applied for.

“Everything else you hear is red herrings and rumors … to stop the natural growth area of this property,” he said.

Sweckard expressed dismay at the outrage over the rezone.

“I’m not used to being the bad guy. It’s weird for me,” he said. “Laramie is my home and always will be. I purchased this property because I saw an opportunity for a piece of land to be better — one that I felt had been an eyesore.”

Geologist Chris Moody suggested that commissioners should propose a site-specific investigation be conducted on the Sweckard property before moving forward.

“You could put a drill rig on that property and drill a four-inch pilot hole and know exactly how much Satanka is on top of the aquifer. It would cost you $600 bucks,” he said.

Gosar offered to personally pay for any study that would give clarity for where the APOZ should be.

“If it takes me putting my entire salary toward finding the western boundary, I’m willing to do it,” Gosar said.

He asked if Sweckard would be willing to have such a study conducted, but Edwards said that would be an inappropriate condition to place on a rezone request.

Kimberly Starkey suggested that it should actually be safer to have the land rezoned to commercial since the Sweckard property is currently subdivided as six residential lots.

“Leave it the same, and Mr. Sweckard can put in six septic tanks and wells on that land, and wells are arguable the more risky because you’re making a direct conduit to the aquifer,” she said.

Tuesday’s meeting provided for the most contentious discussion at a commission meeting in months, and Richardson panned the public comment that characterized the zoning change as a potential death sentence for the city.

“This discussion has been absolutely hyperbolic,” Richardson said. “What I learned is that … the developer is an evil corporate robber baron who wants to steal from everybody and ruin our community just because he wants to make $100,000. … At least if someone’s going to discuss, they can discuss in a reasonable manner.”

At one point, tensions between audience members and Richardson led to some residents heckling him as he made some assertions about the durability of the Casper Aquifer.

“There was a lot of discussion today about where the city gets its water, and none of it is down-gradient from this property,” he said. “The water is produced from the Soldier Springs well, which is miles and miles away, and the Spur well, which is miles and miles away, and the Pope Springs well, which is miles and miles away. There’s not cross communication. … It’s subdivided like a tackle box and it doesn’t run north to south five miles. … The Turner wells aren’t used for domestic water, because it’s not fit for that. It just runs down Spring Creek.”

“You’re wrong,” Moody retorted, with a few other audience members joining in jeering the commissioner.

(4) comments


I am just waiting for Patrick Sheehy AKA watchdog comments. I thought Heber was going to punch him in the nose today..🤣🤣🤣

Watch Dog

Whoa hey there Waheguru, my favorite person in the whole wide-world. I hate to bust your bubble again bro...!!! But, you are really way wrong -like usual in your false accusations and inaccurate assumptions! You come back for more? You are a brute for punishment!! If Heber would of taken a punch to Patrick Sheehy's nose I can guarantee you 100%- Heber would be plugging his own sewer septic sucking device. His Honeywagon would be out of service. Why would these people with no education or experience and minimal intelligence not listen to experts in their field that were all saying don't re-zone that land? Apparently Heber Richardson and Teri Jones and the Albany Planning and Zoning Commission and Robert Starkey were all invited ( apparently they didn't invite Pete Gosar or he was to honest to accept their bribe) to Phil Nicholas and Jason Tangeman's x-mas party and got a very nice Christmas present ($$$) and sold their souls and their vote in the process. Why would Sweckard care about an eye-sore that didn't bother him for the last 50 years? When there is many more eye-sores he could purchased around Laramie. That is rather strange. Why would he all of a sudden be prompted to buy this one? The one right across from the Tumbleweed sitting in the aquifer? If it was such an eye-sore why now did it have to be re-zoned to commercial so fast? Why would the County hire Geologist to do a study of the aquifer and then totally ignore it? And then agreed with Phil Nicholas, and Geologist Starkey who were Pandhers paid liars? A whole lot of unanswered questions here that need to be investigated and brought to light. For once Trent is right - this needs to be brought to litigation and expose this corruption and put the crooks in prison.


Ok!!! Let’s assume everything you say is 100% correct!! But let’s not overlook this fact that City of Laramie is not completely honest with us either. I have spoken to EPA about APOZ twice in last 6 months. Adoption of APOZ comes from their guidelines. It clearly states that APOZ should not have any Gas Station or heavy industry , interstate system or busy traffic corridor. Leave alone this APOZ has every possible problem you could imagine. My concern is that how in the world city would overlook all the issues and decide to draw the water from that troubled area. Why not take care of gas station or possible contamination first then declare that part as APOZ . I mean city is charging us the crazy amount for the water every month but not guarantee the quality of water for future generations. What kind of garbage is that. How hard it was for city to buy that dinky station when it was for sale I think 10 years. City & County expect us to resolve their screwup. I can’t do it. Ain’t got that kind of money. City & county could have easily buy & put it behind them. But of course litigation is an easy route for Trent , given the fact that Wyoming Supreme Court isn’t really liking Trent lately. Good luck winning in court taking someone’s property rights without compensation. Show me one precedent if that ever happened. City is using emotion of some concerned folks to win this rather than come clean & explain why they picked that spot for aquifer which already was a cesspool of septic tanks & 💯 percent land,, which again is literally impossible to enforce. But who am I to ask since y’all are geniuses..🤷🏻‍♂️🤷🏻‍♂️


wow....laramie at its best. Thanks, Pete G. --- really an honorable position to stand up so large! Does anyone see a mediation/negotiation frontier possible? why not consider sevreral "package" options?

1. annex to city @ a minimal charge due to interagency rule span, such that the cost/benefit analysis would not impune the current value to owner--as long as it is not a hyperbolic value in excess of a rolling 3, 5 or 10 year market value period.

2. Treat this as, indeed, a true unique variance ( in its nature of an incomplete position in/out of the APOZ..) That said, if an equivalent sole occupant business use is sufficiently equivalent value to the afore-mentioned possibility of 6 developed residential lots--with attendant wells/septic ---which seems way more onerous and undesirable.....THEN- as exclusive variant: impose building restrictions/covenants to make business form defined to minimize environmental effects to satisfy majority of all future litigant parties. Yes, a time-consuming process, but maybe the least harm fo most?

#. regarding mr. Sweckerd......the lot/land in question has for quite some time been in the midst of a highly contentious area. i cannot imagine many people would walk into, buy and blithely entertain normal marketing and development. (sorta radioactive? in a well-published, standing era of conflicting ideals? ) Why did not you initiate your own ideas towards actual future tenant type and use? Do you have a buyer that might fit that ideal? Or is there a nascent buyer with future problematic uses.....that might be grandfathered ( again???) due to this zone ruling?

3. It is not fair in entirety that Swekerd be denied a marketable opportunity , but he does bear the prior mentioned risk of marketing impact. I feel a litigation ruling would find more empathetic to my thought of Sweckerds parcel value and its inherent risk he bears.... and he is/has a long- standing experience in real estate sales/use/development......so cannot full rely on compensatory ( as in value-offsetting subsidy payment upon eventual sale (or disposition otherwise)...to be paid by either city or county interagency vicarious liabilities doctrine...) This litigation event gets messy and prolonged in a very short order....and largely, the attorney pools are the real winners. no?

$. why hasnt the requisite FULL aquifer limits--w/r/t that seemingly 75 of shale- been performed? if that is the definitive variable that most parties are seemingly agreed to rely upon???? Why? not?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.