In the Boomerang article, dated June 17, several allegations about the June 15 performance of “The Fantasticks’ were quoted in the paper.  We would like to address these statements. 

Theatre is a vehicle for education and communication.  Watching live theatre touches our emotions and thoughts in a way that we can only process based our own experience. For some of us, the Fantasticks (having opened in 1960) has always been playing, off Broadway and elsewhere; it's the world's longest-running musical, frequently produced, universal in its core story, and typically enjoyed by all ages. Different from the responses we may have to television or digital media, live performance impacts us in a more visceral way.  This is the magic of theatre, but as we are periodically reminded, it comes with the potential to offend.

UW Theatre and Dance’s current production, “The Fantasticks,” presents a musical about two young lovers who see the world as a patchwork fantasy based on information they have gleaned from romance novels, adventure stories, and references to works of art.  These tropes present stereotypes, and even caricatures, from specific historical periods. The story follows the pair as they discover the difference between fantasy and reality and build a lasting relationship.  The play functions as a critique of the lovers’ untested and unrealistic perspectives of the world, as well as a celebration of love.

“The Fantasticks” was pivotal in the history of the American musical theatre, a departure from the excess of the time, and led to the development of future works. This musical may not always represent the overarching values of society or our personal values, but it can help us to reflect on such.  We can laugh, cry, and take offense, as stereotypes and caricatures present difficult representations of our realities and ideals, and others’ perceptions. 

In their director's guide, authors Tom Jones and Harvey Schmidt acknowledge that they "borrowed theatrical devices from many cultures and many times," including the Greek Chorus, Italian Commedia dell 'Arte stock characters and staging, the invisible properties man "from the Oriental theatre,” and "the robust traditions of our homegrown American musical comedy."

The challenge, then, in producing historical works is to help audiences to understand their context.  For example, we can only assume that the reference to alleged “rape jokes” in the June 17th Boomerang article grows out of a misunderstanding of the two uses of the word in the musical. "It Depends On What You Pay,” the musical number in which a proposed fake abduction of the girl is pitched to the parents as a means of bringing the lovers together, was in the original production "the Rape ballet” and although that word was intended to be used in its archaic sense of “abduct” (such as in Alexander Pope’s poem, The Rape of the Lock), that is not what the modern ear hears.  Thus, the song was updated in the mid-1990’s. The girl also refers to the “Rape of the Sabine Women,” an incident from Roman mythology that has been depicted by many early Renaissance painters, which epitomizes the foolishness of her romantic ideals.  Other language, such as the frequent use of 'gay' to mean happy, is usually deemed obviously dated, but harmlessly quaint.

The use of "Indians" as stock characters, alongside pirates and bandits, as a shortcut for exotic and dangerous outsiders, is now coming to the fore as problematic. Whether it is unquestioned, as in Peter Pan productions the world over, or painfully obvious, as it was for our audiences on opening night, this kind of portrayal deserves consideration. In this case, it is an actor playing a two-bit actor playing a stock character from his traveling troupe, and truly reductive and indicative: a caricature.  With historical productions, we see a “point in time” that is different from our own, and character portrayals that can be painful to watch to 21st century audiences. 

While, professionally, we are bound to present works “as written,” and cannot take undue or illegal liberties with a script, we recognize that we failed to provide sufficient context for this scene and the play to prospective audience members.  We immediately produced program notes for future performances to address this error.  

We regret the discomfort that this scene in the opening night performance caused the Native American students and other audience attending, and honor the validity of their response and their protest.  We are sympathetic to their perspective.

The cast and the crew were shocked and saddened, and wished that they would have had the opportunity to have a dialogue with these students.  We invite future conversations with all members of the community. 

As a department, our primary responsibility is to support our students and their work. In a meeting with the cast members of the production, we discussed whether to close the show because of the prevalence of this issue in social media and the resultant newspaper article, and how this might impact their commitment to the work and their performance.  The performances scheduled for the state, sadly, will be cancelled.  We want to focus on the Laramie community, provide a time for dialogue and for people to have the opportunity to see the performance for themselves.

The performers’ response was vehement and unified.  “As actors we stand behind the integrity of this production.  It comes from a place of love.  We look forward to sharing this beautifully simple love story with all of our audiences.”

“The Fantasticks” is a show about love – the naive love that sees no flaws, and the world-wise love that comes from a mixture of experience and knowledge.  We know that there are flaws in the play, but it contains a message of hope and inclusion, delivered through the simplest elements of theatrical magic.  We hope you will feel the same.

We encourage you to support the company members in this production, and if you come please understand that “The Fantasticks” presents elements that are clearly sensitive, but are not intended to offend.

(1) comment

Brett Glass

Here is my letter to the Boomerang on the subject, which it apparently did not deign to be worthy of publication:

Dear Editor:

The "protestors" who walked out on UW's production of "The Fantasticks" are missing the point of this wonderful, classic work and should be gently educated (since UW is, after all, an educational institution) as to its meaning.

The "Fantasticks" (an Anglicization of the French "Les Fantastiques" -- those who fantasize) are two naive young people who are manipulated into falling in love. But since each was raised by a single parent, neither has any role models for a real life romantic relationship. They thus rely on their fantasies, which in turn are based on books and popular media -- hers of a Latin lover with whom she dances all night; his of a perfect, goddess-like being.

The play pokes fun at these and other pop culture tropes, including TV westerns (it introduces an obviously non-Native American actor, playing an "Indian," whose sole talent is to die dramatically) and melodrama (in which the heroine is abducted -- the word "rape" is used, but in that sense, not as a joke or in the sense of sexual assault -- only to be rescued against impossible odds by the hero).

The Native Americans who protest the presence of the "Indian," as well as those who are concerned about the abduction, are missing the satire and failing to realize that the authors of the play were, in fact on their side. They were well aware that the barbaric "Indians" of old Westerns are a cheesy, one-dimensional media trope -- as are the daring bandito and the melodrama's hero getting the girl (who swoons when he declares his affection). And their characters grow and learn this too, though they must be hurt to be disabused of their fantasies ("Without a hurt, the heart is hollow").

The Fantasticks is a rich and deep musical -- one which can be produced, incredibly, with only 7 actors, a nearly bare stage, a pianist, and sometimes a harpist. UW's production is not the first time it has been performed in Laramie; a previous one featured Wyoming's Lynne and Pete Simpson as the parents. I recommend that anyone who is able to attend the show, which is touring the state, go and see it.

--Brett Glass, Laramie WY

[Postscript: Unfortunately, UW has knuckled under to pressure from these uninformed protestors. It "sanitized" the script for its remaining shows -- substituting "pirates" for "indians" -- and has canceled the musical's tour of the state. It's sad that the polarization and lack of civil discourse in today's world has come to this.]

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.