‘Misfortunate misunderstanding’ leads to animal welfare violation

The U.S. Department of Agriculture reported in July the University of Wyoming provided inadequate veterinary care of two research sheep.

Bret Hess, associate dean of the UW Agricultural Experiment Station, said the sheep were housed at the Laramie Research and Extension Center and the violation resulted from a “misfortunate understanding that was taken care of immediately.”

USDA inspectors conduct unannounced visits to licensed or registered facilities to ensure compliance with the Animal Welfare Act.

USDA Veterinary Medical Officer Engel Dominique noted personnel at the Laramie facility failed to follow federal law which requires research facilities to provide “daily observation of all animals to assess their health and well-being” and ensure that “timely and accurate information on problems of animal health, behavior, and well-being is conveyed to the attending veterinarian.”

When one sheep suffered from urinary calculi in June, facility personnel tried to treat the animal themselves instead of calling a veterinarian. The animal ultimately died from the urinary calculi June 11.

The attending veterinarian was also not informed when another sheep was “vomiting almost on a daily basis” and staff were having to hand-feed her alfalfa pellets separately from the herd.

In an “unfortunate set of circumstances,” Hess said those personnel thought it was their responsibility — not the attending veterinarian’s — to attend to the animals’ health.

“This isn’t a case of neglect. It’s a case of proper procedures being followed,” Hess said.

Dominique listed UW’s federal violation as a “critical” noncompliance.

“Adequate daily observation of all animals and direct communication with the attending veterinarian is critical to ensure that conditions that can adversely affect health and well-being can be diagnosed and treated in a timely manner,” Dominique says in the July 10 report. “Injuries, diseases, and medical conditions that are not treated properly (as directed by a veterinarian) may be worsened and can lead to prolonged suffering.”

In 2018, USDA has produced inspection reports for 775 research facilities. Of those reports, only 15 contained “critical” violations.

Other universities to receive a violation categorized as “critical” in 2018 include North Dakota State University, the University of Montana, Washington University, the University of Wisconsin-Madison and UC-Davis.

When Dominique previously conducted an inspection of UW in 2017, the inspector noted that bales of hay being fed to sheep were being stored outside with no protection — allowing mold to grow.

Another routine inspection of the university in 2016 found no non-compliant items. In 2012, it was fined $8,571 for not providing veterinary care to baby goats infested with parasites.

In response to the latest USDA report, animal rights groups have criticized UW.

Ingrid Taylor, a veterinarian with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, even called for an end to UW research and said “basic veterinary treatment and decent care appear to be foreign concepts inside laboratories at the University of Wyoming.”

Hess said PETA is “blowing this totally out of proportion.”

(2) comments

LucyP

The nonchalant response to these animals’ extreme suffering is no surprise, given the culture of indifference and callousness in laboratories where living beings are used as research tools. The sheep who was denied veterinary care for stones in the urinary tract would have suffered terribly over a prolonged period. There is simply no excuse for this neglect, and it points to the need to end our reliance on experiments that use animals.

Jschro21

The "facts" in this article just don't cut it. They forget all the important details of the fact that if you can't afford veterinary care, you do absolutely nothing involved with a veterinarian! Look at it this way, if a person has the flu and can't afford the doctors prescribed medicine and has no insurance what do they do? They go to a grocery store to buy a cheaper fix. And that is EXACTLY what farms, ranches, etc... do, they get the cheaper fix. And sometimes it results badly. But death is a fact of life. So I would say if people feel so badly about how animals are treated, remember we do the same things with humans! If you want proper treatment and all that stuff, then donate a whole lot of money to the university farm to help with costs!! It is clear that none of you guys have ever stepped onto a ranch or farm because death happens all the time when you can't afford veterinary care. Think of when a dig gets run over and paralyzed, what happens then? They get put down 9/10 times. Now some people say that's proper, but according to P.E.T.A. guidelines, I would then argue that nobody in the whole world should have animals because nobody deserves them. People need to grow up and mind their own business. Death is common in ranching and farming!! Nuff said!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.